First lightning of the year

Lightning strikes in Memphis

I knew it would work out this way. After spending three days driving 2200 miles stormchasing the midwest…and getting essentially nothing…all it took was a vacation to Memphis and standing outside on the patio to get my first real lightning shots of the season. I did get a few in Nebraska two weeks ago, but they were from pretty far away and don’t really measure up to my standards *tee hee*

I actually did take my bro-in-law’s car and drove about 1/4 mile down the road to a more open area to get the shot above, but most of the stuff just came over the house for 2-3 hours and it was easy pickin’s.

One thing I did learn last night: I love my Canon 85mm 1.8 lens for shooting lightning. The photo above was with that lens and it’s uncropped. If you zoom into the full-sized version, you can see even more lightning trails. LOVE IT. Clear, crisp…wonderful. Can’t wait to use it this monsoon season.

As always, you can click on the image to see it larger!

(exif above: canon eos 5d mark ii, canon 85mm 1.8, f/5, iso 100, 25 sec)

(exif below: canon eos 5d mark ii, tamron 17-35mm 2.8, 17mm, f/5, iso 100, 20 sec)


 

Figures

26 replies
  1. Scott Ackerman
    Scott Ackerman says:

    Awesome bud. Both are great, but like you said, I love the detail in that first shot. Never thought to try the 85 for lightning, I’ll have to give it a go on my next lightning op.

  2. Mike
    Mike says:

    Yeah, I like the second shot a lot better myself. More going on for sure, but the details are great in the bolts.

    Thank you guys!

  3. A.Barlow
    A.Barlow says:

    Freaking amazing man! Hard to stop looking at it. Something primal in lightning, I just LOVE IT!

    I wish we had lightning out in California. It’s so so rare though…

  4. Justin
    Justin says:

    Awesome. The 85 1.8 (nikon in my bag) is a favorite lens of me. Small enough not to be intimidating. As you know, it is a great portrait focal range.

  5. Scott Wood
    Scott Wood says:

    First off I am very jealous, but that should not be a surprise. 🙂

    I like both of them, but the tree in the second one really works well. I think that the 85mm on a full frame body will end up working very well for desert shooting, very comparable to 50mm on a crop body.

  6. Chris DeAngelis
    Chris DeAngelis says:

    I don’t know what powers you possess to conjur storms and lightening like that, but you sure do a great job of photographing it :). Any reason you shoot at f/5 for your lightening shots? I also need the 85…

  7. Kristi Hines
    Kristi Hines says:

    Thanks for sharing the difference between the two lenses. 85mm seems to be the way to go for details. Both are fantastic shots! Glad this trip is producing some wonderful storms for ya! 🙂

  8. Ryan Sexton
    Ryan Sexton says:

    That’s some sick lighting. Everything I read on the 85mm is great. Most people say its one of the sharpest lenses out there. I do like the second one more, the colors with silhouetted trees is fantastic.

  9. Mike
    Mike says:

    @ Chris – Not sure why I chose f/5.0. I think maybe the fact that it was a long exposure of 20-25 seconds at iso 100 and pretty much exposed correctly was one reason. If I upped it to f/8.0, then at 25 seconds I’d probably need to also up the iso.

    Whenever you shoot lightning, keeping the iso at 100 is pretty important for noise issues. Sometimes you may have to bump it up if the lightning is far off and not super-bright, but then again, those don’t turn out awesome most of the time anyways 🙂

  10. Steve Beal
    Steve Beal says:

    So incredibly awesome! I was surprised to see that you use ISO 100 – I would have thought you’d need a higher ISO for single exposure, low light, but your shots came out incredible! I’m curious to see if I can employ my 600mm f/4 this summer for some lightning shots – that lens is like a lightning rod in itself 🙂

  11. Mike
    Mike says:

    @ Steve – Depends I guess, but you really don’t want your lightning blown-out with a higher ISO. Also, noise is a problem the higher you go and do longer exposures.

    600mm seems a bit zoomed in…but if you are far away, it may work out okay!

  12. Heath O'Fee
    Heath O'Fee says:

    LOVE these, Mike. And typical that as soon as you get back from chasing storms, you take a pleasure vacation and get hit with a boatload of ’em 🙂

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.